The Nanolix Lab Notes
Technical writing on generative chemistry, ADMET prediction, scaffold hopping, and the practical side of computational hit identification — from the scientists who run these programs.
How Accurate Are GNN-Based Molecular Property Predictions in Practice?
Graph neural networks for ADMET prediction have improved dramatically on benchmark datasets — but benchmark accuracy rarely translates directly to prospective performance.
Multi-Objective Optimization and Pareto Fronts in Drug Discovery
You cannot simultaneously maximize binding affinity, minimize toxicity, and maximize synthesizability without trade-offs. Pareto optimization surfaces the real trade-off frontier.
Getting CROs to Synthesize Computationally Generated Candidates
Generative models sometimes propose synthetic routes that CRO chemists reject outright. Here is how to structure deliverables so synthesis is actually feasible.
How to Interpret Confidence Intervals in Computational ADMET Predictions
A predicted log P of 2.1 ± 0.8 means something very different from 2.1 ± 0.2. Understanding model uncertainty changes how you prioritize candidates.
Fragment Expansion with ML Guidance: From 200 Da to Drug-Like
Fragment hits are cheap to find but hard to grow while maintaining binding and physical properties. Here is the ML-guided expansion approach we use in practice.
Small-Molecule Design for Historically 'Undruggable' Targets
Targets once deemed undruggable are yielding to fragment-based methods and generative exploration of cryptic binding sites. What we have learned running these programs.
Why Synthetic Accessibility Must Be a First-Class Model Objective
Beautiful binding affinity predictions are useless if the compound requires 12-step synthesis and non-commercial reagents. Here is how we bake accessibility in.
Scaffold Hopping Under Property Constraints: A Practical Guide
When your lead compound has liabilities you can't design out, scaffold hopping is the answer — but only if you constrain property predictions from the start.
Generative Chemistry vs. Enumerative Screening: When Each Makes Sense
Enumerative virtual screening is fast and interpretable. Generative methods explore regions enumeration misses. The choice depends on your scaffold constraints.
Predicting ADMET Properties Before You Touch the Bench
What 11 ADMET dimensions matter most in early-stage hit identification and how ensemble prediction models handle each.
Why Brute-Force Hit Identification Fails Small Biotech Teams
HTS screens millions of compounds but covers a vanishingly small fraction of viable chemical space. Here is why that math doesn't favor small teams.